1961 NSU Prinz IV vs. 1999 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 1999 Mazda Laputa is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 NSU Prinz IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 NSU Prinz IV would be higher. At 658 cc (3 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Laputa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Laputa (53 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. (30 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Laputa should accelerate faster than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Laputa weights approximately 185 kg more than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 NSU Prinz IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 NSU Prinz IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda Laputa (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. (44 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda Laputa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 NSU Prinz IV. 1999 Mazda Laputa has automatic transmission and 1961 NSU Prinz IV has manual transmission. 1961 NSU Prinz IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda Laputa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 NSU Prinz IV | 1999 Mazda Laputa | |
| Make | NSU | Mazda |
| Model | Prinz IV | Laputa |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 44 Nm | 63 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 565 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 30 L |
