1961 Peugeot 403 vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Peugeot 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Peugeot 403 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Peugeot 403 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Smart ForFour (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1961 Peugeot 403. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1961 Peugeot 403.
Because 1961 Peugeot 403 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Peugeot 403. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Peugeot 403 | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Peugeot | Smart |
Model | 403 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1123 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 22 L |