1961 Porsche 356 vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Porsche 356 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Porsche 356 (135 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2010 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Porsche 356 should accelerate faster than 2010 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 60 kg more than 1961 Porsche 356.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Porsche 356 | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Porsche | Smart |
Model | 356 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 33 L |