1961 Reliant Sabre Six vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Reliant Sabre Six (109 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1961 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Reliant Sabre Six | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Reliant | Ford |
| Model | Sabre Six | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |
