1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 1996 Volvo 850 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 718 kg more than 1996 Volvo 850.
Because 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Volvo |
| Model | Silver Cloud | 850 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2108 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2670 mm |
