1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 1168 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
| Model | Silver Cloud | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2108 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 48 L |
