1961 Skoda 1200 vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1961 Skoda 1200. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1961 Skoda 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 590 kg more than 1961 Skoda 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Skoda 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Skoda 1200. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Skoda 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Skoda 1200 | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Skoda | Nissan |
Model | 1200 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1219 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 16.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1600 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 60 L |