1961 Skoda 1200 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Matiz
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 1,219 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Skoda 1200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1961 Skoda 1200. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Matiz should accelerate faster than 1961 Skoda 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Skoda 1200 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Matiz.
Because 1961 Skoda 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Skoda 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Skoda 1200 (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Matiz. (71 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1961 Skoda 1200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Skoda 1200 | 2012 Chevrolet Matiz | |
Make | Skoda | Chevrolet |
Model | 1200 | Matiz |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1219 cc | 794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 35 L |