1961 Trabant Universal vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Trabant Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Trabant Universal would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1961 Trabant Universal. (20 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1961 Trabant Universal.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Trabant Universal. (44 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Trabant Universal.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Trabant Universal | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Trabant | Chevrolet |
Model | Universal | Malibu |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 499 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 20 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 44 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2852 mm |