1961 Triumph TR3 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1961 Triumph TR3. (101 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1961 Triumph TR3.
Because 1961 Triumph TR3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Triumph TR3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Triumph TR3. (172 Nm @ 3350 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Triumph TR3.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Triumph TR3 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Triumph | Volvo |
Model | TR3 | C70 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2138 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3350 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 239 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |