1961 Volvo 220 vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Holden UTE weights approximately 485 kg more than 1961 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Volvo 220 | 2006 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Volvo | Holden |
| Model | 220 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2950 mm |
