1961 Volvo 220 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1028 kg more than 1961 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (454 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Volvo 220 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Volvo | Jeep |
| Model | 220 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1778 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3950 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2790 mm |
