1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1947 Austin 16
To start off, 1962 Abarth 1300 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin 16 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 1947 Austin 16 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 1300 | 16 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1947 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 63 L |