1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 1962 Abarth 1300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Riley RM A weights approximately 606 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 1955 Riley RM A | |
Make | Abarth | Riley |
Model | 1300 | RM A |
Year Released | 1962 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1236 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2870 mm |