1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,557 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Lotus Elan weights approximately 66 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotus |
| Model | 1300 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1557 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 696 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 45 L |
