1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III
To start off, 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III (146 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III weights approximately 550 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 1967 Austin-Healey 3000 Mk III | |
Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
Model | 1300 | 3000 Mk III |
Year Released | 1962 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 54 L |