1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Abarth | Volvo |
Model | 1300 | 260 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2660 mm |