1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1995 Kia Retona
To start off, 1995 Kia Retona is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1995 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1995 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Kia Retona weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Because 1995 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 1995 Kia Retona | |
Make | Abarth | Kia |
Model | 1300 | Retona |
Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2370 mm |