1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (200 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 900 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 1996 Chevrolet Lumina | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1300 | Lumina |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2740 mm |