1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1996 Ford Probe
To start off, 1996 Ford Probe is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Ford Probe. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Probe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Probe weights approximately 600 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 1996 Ford Probe | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Probe |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 58 L |