1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 870 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Because 1996 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Abarth | Honda |
Model | 1300 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 128 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2620 mm |