1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (213 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1815 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 7275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3510 mm |
