1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 BMW Z9
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2000 BMW Z9 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | 1300 | Z9 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3110 mm |
