1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 4663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3270 mm |