1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2002 Acura RL
To start off, 2002 Acura RL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RL (225 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RL weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2002 Acura RL | |
| Make | Abarth | Acura |
| Model | 1300 | RL |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 3472 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 225 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 50 L |
