1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,278 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Abarth 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi eK weights approximately 160 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Abarth | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1300 | eK |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2350 mm |