1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2003 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2003 Opel Meriva is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2003 Opel Meriva. (101 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Meriva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Meriva weights approximately 750 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 2003 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Abarth | Opel |
Model | 1300 | Meriva |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 53 L |