1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2004 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 765 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Bristol Blenheim | |
Make | Abarth | Bristol |
Model | 1300 | Blenheim |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 105 L |