1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,278 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Abarth 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2490 mm |
