1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2005 BMW 316
To start off, 2005 BMW 316 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2005 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2005 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 316 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 2005 BMW 316 | |
Make | Abarth | BMW |
Model | 1300 | 316 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 63 L |