1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 632 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Abarth | Suzuki |
Model | 1300 | Reno |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1262 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 55 L |