1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (292 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 1300 | TrailBlazer |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 4163 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 292 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 95 L |
