1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2006 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Stilo (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Stilo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 2006 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Abarth | Fiat |
Model | 1300 | Stilo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |