1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 445 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1300 | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 98 L |