1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (368 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | 1300 | Charger |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 5652 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 368 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 72 L |
