1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 763 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 1300 | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 1300 | Commander |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1278 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 80 L |