1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Alpina B3
To start off, 2010 Alpina B3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alpina B3 (355 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Alpina B3 weights approximately 930 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Alpina B3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alpina B3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Alpina B3 | |
| Make | Abarth | Alpina |
| Model | 1300 | B3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 355 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2730 mm |
