1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,278 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Abarth 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 1300 (137 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Jazz weights approximately 418 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
| Make | Abarth | Honda |
| Model | 1300 | Jazz |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 1245 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 77 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1048 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 42 L |
