1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300.
Because 1962 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Abarth | Holden |
| Model | 1300 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2700 mm |
