1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1877 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 397 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2507 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5144 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2007 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1928 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2947 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 98 L |
