1962 Abarth 1300 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 1300. (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 1282 kg more than 1962 Abarth 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Abarth 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 1300 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | XTS |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1278 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2837 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 76 L |
