1962 Abarth 2400 vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1968 Zastava 850 K is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 2400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 2400 would be higher. At 2,323 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Abarth 2400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 2400 (142 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 2400 should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Abarth 2400 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 2400 | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Abarth | Zastava |
| Model | 2400 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 2323 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2010 mm |
