1962 Abarth 2400 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 2400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 2400 would be higher. At 2,323 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Abarth 2400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Abarth 2400 (142 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Abarth 2400 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Abarth 2400 (196 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 Abarth 2400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 2400 | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 2400 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2323 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 196 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2210 mm |