1962 Abarth 2400 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 2400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 2400 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 2400. (196 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 2400.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 2400 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | |
Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 2400 | CK |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2323 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 196 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 270 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2440 mm |