1962 Abarth 600 vs. 1987 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1987 Toyota Celica is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 600 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Toyota Celica (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 600. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Toyota Celica weights approximately 507 kg more than 1962 Abarth 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Abarth 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Toyota Celica (157 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 600. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1987 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 600.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 600 | 1987 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 600 | Celica |
Year Released | 1962 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 583 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |