1962 Abarth 600 vs. 1994 Dodge Neon
To start off, 1994 Dodge Neon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 600 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Dodge Neon (150 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 600. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Dodge Neon weights approximately 544 kg more than 1962 Abarth 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Abarth 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Dodge Neon (178 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 600. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 600 | 1994 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Abarth | Dodge |
| Model | 600 | Neon |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 92 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 583 kg | 1127 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 42 L |
