1962 Abarth 600 vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 600 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 600. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 917 kg more than 1962 Abarth 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Abarth 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (250 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 600. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 600 | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 600 | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 92 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 583 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
