1962 Abarth 600 vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 600 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 600. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Murano weights approximately 1153 kg more than 1962 Abarth 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Abarth 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (334 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 600. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Abarth 600 | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | Abarth | Nissan |
| Model | 600 | Murano |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 92 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 583 kg | 1736 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 82 L |
