1962 Abarth 600 vs. 2007 Cadillac STS

To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 600 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 600. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Cadillac STS weights approximately 983 kg more than 1962 Abarth 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 600. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 600. 2007 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1962 Abarth 600 has manual transmission. 1962 Abarth 600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Abarth 600 2007 Cadillac STS
Make Abarth Cadillac
Model 600 STS
Year Released 1962 2007
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 980 cc 4565 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 59 HP 320 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 92 Nm 427 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 583 kg 1566 kg
Vehicle Length 3300 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1390 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2960 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 64 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]