1962 Abarth 600 vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Abarth 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Abarth 600 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1962 Abarth 600. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1962 Abarth 600.
Because 1962 Abarth 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Abarth 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Abarth 600. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Abarth 600. 2010 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 1962 Abarth 600 has manual transmission. 1962 Abarth 600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Abarth 600 | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Abarth | Saturn |
Model | 600 | Outlook |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1990 mm |